<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Graham Cluley's blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos:80/index.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos</link>
	<description>From anti-flappertanknibbles to zombies. Get inside the head of a computer security expert. If you like.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Britney Spears has her Twitter account hacked again</title>
		<link>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/12/britney-spears-twitter-account-hacked/</link>
		<comments>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/12/britney-spears-twitter-account-hacked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Graham Cluley, Sophos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Identity Theft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[britney spears]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/?p=6637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Just over two months ago I explained on Twitter why I was following Britney Spears. In a nutshell, I follow Britney on Twitter not because I'm interested in her music or her complicated private life, but because it's the best way of getting a heads-up on when her account next gets hacked.
Ironically enough, I wasn't [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/britney-170.jpg" alt="Britney Spears" title="Britney Spears" align="right" vspace="10" hspace="10"><br />
Just over two months ago I <a href="http://twitter.com/gcluley/status/3712762999" rel="nofollow" title="Link to Twitter post by @gcluley">explained on Twitter</a> why I was following Britney Spears. In a nutshell, I follow Britney on Twitter not because I'm interested in her music or her complicated private life, but because it's the best way of getting a heads-up on when her account next gets hacked.</p>
<p>Ironically enough, I wasn't on Twitter today as I was down in London speaking at the <a href="http://www.kable.co.uk/information-security" rel="nofollow" title="Link to event website">"Information Security in the Public Sector"</a> conference about social networking threats.  </p>
<p>So, where's the irony?  Well, while I was talking about <a href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/01/07/celebrity-twitter-accounts-hacked/">some of Britney's past troubles on Twitter</a> her account was being hacked - again!</p>
<p>This time the bad guys replaced her wallpaper and profile picture with emblems suggesting she was part of some conspiratorial masonic secret world government (as far as I know, this isn't true about Britney, although I have sometimes suspected she might be a shape-shifting lizard):</p>
<p><img src="http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/britney-twitter-hacked.jpg" alt='Britney's Twitter account hacked" title="Britney's Twitter account hacked"></p>
<p>Some messages were also posted to her legions of followers (over 3.7 million at the last count);</p>
<blockquote><p><tt>i hope that the new world order will arrive as soon as possible! -Britney</tt></p>
<p>and</p>
<p><tt>I give myself to Lucifer every day for it to arrive as quickly as possible. Glory to Satan!</tt></p></blockquote>
<p>I guess we should be grateful that this hack appears to have been mindless vandalism rather than motivated by more malicious intentions.  Imagine, for example, if the hacker had posted a message saying "Free tickets to a secret concert" which had taken some of Britney Spears's millions of ardent fans to a malicious website?</p>
<p>It's not clear at this stage how Britney's Twitter account was compromised - but probably the most likely bet is that a simple easy-to-crack password was being used or that one of Britney's team fell for a phishing attack.</p>
<p>However the attack happened it's a timely reminder to all of us (whether responsible for Twitter accounts with a small or huge following) to take greater care with our online security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/12/britney-spears-twitter-account-hacked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tool for hacking jailbroken iPhones discovered</title>
		<link>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/11/tool-hacking-jailbroken-iphones-discovered/</link>
		<comments>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/11/tool-hacking-jailbroken-iphones-discovered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Graham Cluley, Sophos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Data loss]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/?p=6628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to The Register and others, a tool which allows hackers to break into jailbroken iPhones and steal information has been discovered.
Following closely in the footsteps of the first iPhone worm (known as Ikee) which hunted for jailbroken iPhones running SSH which were still using the default password of "alpine", the hacking tool reportedly allows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/11/iphone_hacking_tool/" rel="nofollow" title="Link to article in The Register">The Register</a> and others, a tool which allows hackers to break into jailbroken iPhones and steal information has been discovered.</p>
<p>Following closely in the footsteps of the <a href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/11/08/iphone-worm-discovered-wallpaper-rick-astley-photo/">first iPhone worm</a> (known as Ikee) which hunted for jailbroken iPhones running SSH which were still using the default password of "alpine", the hacking tool reportedly allows criminals to steal emails, contacts, calendars and other data stored on the device.</p>
<p><img src="http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/iphone-hacking.jpg" alt="iPhone hacking" title="iPhone hacking"></p>
<p>Sophos has not yet received a sample of the hacking tool, which was first reported by French Mac security company Intego.  David Harley of ESET <a href="http://www.eset.com/threat-center/blog/2009/11/11/iphoneprivacy-a-a-bit-more-info" rel="nofollow">reports</a> that the tool is in reality a script written in Python - meaning it can be run on a variety of different platforms.  In other words, a hacker could run the script on his Mac or Windows or Linux computer to try and find vulnerable iPhones.</p>
<p>It's important to recognise that the tool (dubbed iPhone/Privacy.A by Intego) is not a virus or a worm, and can not spread under its own steam.  Nevertheless the advice remains the same - if you are going to tinker and jailbreak your iPhone, make sure you also change its default password to something other than "alpine".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/11/tool-hacking-jailbroken-iphones-discovered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duck savages Ikee iPhone worm author</title>
		<link>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/11/duck-savages-ikee-iphone-worm-author/</link>
		<comments>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/11/duck-savages-ikee-iphone-worm-author/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Graham Cluley, Sophos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Towns]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ikee]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/?p=6622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Sophos's Paul Ducklin has been voicing some strong opinions.
There's nothing new about that, of course, as you'll know if you're a regular follower of his blog.
This time, though, Duck, is explaining why he can't excuse the author of the recent iPhone worm, Ikee, and why he feels the majority of people got the answer wrong [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/risky-business.jpg" align="right" vspace="10" hspace="10" alt="Risky Business" title="Risky Business"><br />
Sophos's Paul Ducklin has been voicing some strong opinions.</p>
<p>There's nothing new about that, of course, as you'll know if you're a regular follower of <a href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/duck">his blog</a>.</p>
<p>This time, though, Duck, is explaining why he can't excuse the author of the <a href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/11/08/iphone-worm-discovered-wallpaper-rick-astley-photo/">recent iPhone worm, Ikee</a>, and why he feels the majority of people <a href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/11/09/75-worm-author-iphone-users-favour-poll-reveals/">got the answer wrong</a> when they took a poll earlier this week about whether it was justified to release the worm into the wild.</p>
<p>The below interview, with Patrick Gray of <a href="http://risky.biz" rel="nofollow" title="Link to Risky Business website">Risky Business</a>, is excerpted from this week's Risky Business podcast. You can download the whole podcast (which also features an interview with Ashley Towns himself, the Aussie youngster who has admitted to setting the virus loose) <a href="http://risky.biz/forum/risky-business-131-interview-iphone-worm-author-ikee" rel="nofollow" title="Link to Risky Business podcast">here</a>.</p>
<p>You'll enjoy this, because Duck doesn't mince his words, so give it a listen:</p>
<p><embed src= "http://www.odeo.com/flash/audio_player_standard_gray.swf" quality="high" width="300" height="52" allowScriptAccess="always" wmode="transparent"  type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashvars= "valid_sample_rate=true&#038;external_url=http://www.sophos.com/podcasts/duck-on-ikee-iphone-worm.mp3" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"> </embed></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/11/duck-savages-ikee-iphone-worm-author/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extremely critical Mac OS X patch plugs 58 security holes</title>
		<link>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/10/extremely-critical-mac-os-patch-plugs-58-security-holes/</link>
		<comments>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/10/extremely-critical-mac-os-patch-plugs-58-security-holes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Graham Cluley, Sophos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[patch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/?p=6615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday Apple issued a fix for 58 vulnerabilities in its Mac OS X operating system, many of which could lead to hackers running malicious code and hijacking your Apple Mac.

The update to version 10.6.2 of Mac OS X Snow Leopard also includes a number of "stability and compatibility" update for users, including a fix for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Apple issued a fix for 58 vulnerabilities in its Mac OS X operating system, many of which could lead to hackers running malicious code and hijacking your Apple Mac.</p>
<p><img src="http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/mac-os-x-update.jpg" alt="Mac OS X update" title="Mac OS X update"></p>
<p>The update to version 10.6.2 of Mac OS X Snow Leopard also includes a number of "stability and compatibility" update for users, including a fix for a bug that <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/143286/2009/10/sldataloss.html" rel="nofollow" title="Link to MacWorld article about data loss bug" >permanently deleted user data while using guest accounts</a>.</p>
<p>More information about the products affected by the Apple security vulnerabilities can be found on <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3937" rel="nofollow" title="Link to security advisory on Apple's website">Apple's website</a>.</p>
<p>Security Update 2009-006 has also been released for users of Mac OS X 10.5.8 who have not yet upgraded to Snow Leopard.</p>
<p>It can't be emphasised strongly enough the importance of keeping your computer patched.  Even though there are many more attacks against Windows users than Mac OS X users, that does not mean that Apple fans are completely ignored by the hacking and cybercriminal community.  It is extremely critical that all computer users take their computer security seriously, or risk having their systems and data breached.</p>
<p>Of course you would be wise, before rolling out patches like this to a large number of computers, to test it out on a select number first - just in case there are any incompatibility issues.</p>
<p>Mac users can update their computers via the regular Software Update process, or download a patch directly from <a href="http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/" rel="nofollow" title="Link to Apple Downloads page">Apple Downloads</a>.</p>
<p>It must be a busy time for system administrators in charge of multiple operating systems throughout their companies - later today Microsoft is due to release a <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS09-nov.mspx" rel="nofollow" title="Link to Microsoft security bulletin for November 2009">number of important security patches for its Windows and Office products</a> as part of its regular "Patch Tuesday" schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/10/extremely-critical-mac-os-patch-plugs-58-security-holes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking for source code for the ikee iPhone worm? Sorry</title>
		<link>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/09/source-code-ikee-iphone-worm/</link>
		<comments>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/09/source-code-ikee-iphone-worm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Graham Cluley, Sophos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Clu-blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ikee]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[source code]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/?p=6608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you trying to find the source code for the ikee iPhone worm?
It seems a fair few people are, at least judging by the statistics I've seen for my blog today.
The raw statistics are apparently a closely guarded commercial secret (probably to be filed in a locked cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you trying to find the source code for the <a href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/11/08/iphone-worm-discovered-wallpaper-rick-astley-photo/">ikee iPhone worm</a>?</p>
<p>It seems a fair few people are, at least judging by the statistics I've seen for my blog today.</p>
<p>The raw statistics are apparently a closely guarded commercial secret (probably to be filed in a locked cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying <a href="http://hitchhikerguidetothegalaxy.blogspot.com/2006/04/beware-of-leopard-douglas-adams-quote.html" rel="nofollow" title="Origin of the beware of the leopard quote">"Beware of The Leopard"</a>), but I am allowed to share with you the top keywords that folks around the world have used when stumbling upon my blog today:</p>
<p><img src="http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/ikee-keywords.jpg" alt="Keywords bringing traffic to my blog today" title="Keywords bringing traffic to my blog today"></p>
<p>You'll notice it's not "Rick Astley" or "Rickrolling" that people are searching for.  Instead a hot search term which is bringing people to my website is "ikee source code".</p>
<p>And that worries me.  After all, who has an interest in the ikee worm's source code?  None other than hackers who might want to create more variants of the worm, perhaps with more malicious intentions than displaying a picture of a pop star from the 1980s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/09/source-code-ikee-iphone-worm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>75% believe worm author "did iPhone users a favour", poll reveals</title>
		<link>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/09/75-worm-author-iphone-users-favour-poll-reveals/</link>
		<comments>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/09/75-worm-author-iphone-users-favour-poll-reveals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Graham Cluley, Sophos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iphone ikee]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/?p=6598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find this shocking.
A poll we ran earlier today suggests that three quarters of you think it's okay to spread a virus if it raises awareness of security issues.
We asked what you felt about the behaviour of the author of the first iPhone worm, which has spread in Australia changing wallpapers to an image of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this shocking.</p>
<p>A poll we ran earlier today suggests that three quarters of you think it's okay to spread a virus if it raises awareness of security issues.</p>
<p>We asked what you felt about the behaviour of the author of the <a href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/11/08/iphone-worm-discovered-wallpaper-rick-astley-photo/">first iPhone worm</a>, which has spread in Australia changing wallpapers to an image of 1980s pop star Rick Astley.</p>
<p>Here's what you answered:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2228847.js"></script><noscript><br />
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2228847/">What do you think about the iPhone worm's author?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://www.polldaddy.com">survey</a>)</span><br />
</noscript></p>
<p><font style="font-size: 8pt;" size="-1">(By the way, I know it says 76% above. According to my maths it actually works out as 75.8%, so we'll be generous and say 75%)</font></p>
<p>Has the world gone completely bonkers? It's a depressing notion that most people think that doing harm and breaking computer crime laws is a good thing. The 21-year-old Australian student who wrote the iPhone worm has acted utterly irresponsibly - even if he now regretted (which he doesn't) releasing a worm into the wild, there is nothing he can do to stop it continuing to try and infect jailbroken iPhones.</p>
<p>Can you imagine a world in which everyone takes it upon themselves to release worms and viruses into the wild in the hope that it might "raise awareness"?</p>
<p>Every victim of the iPhone worm has to take steps to repair the damage caused by the worm, and return their phone to normal use. Furthermore, every infected phone will have been eating up the user's data allowance as it hunted for more victims, potentially generating a large bill at the end of the month.</p>
<p>But what's worst of all is that the code for the worm is now available for anyone to download.  The genie is let out of the bottle - and anyone could write a more dangerous version of the worm which could have a much more dangerous payload.</p>
<p>When I first entered this industry umpteen years ago I learnt an essential truth that is still as true as it was then: There's no such thing as a good virus.  (See this <a href="http://www.people.frisk-software.com/~bontchev/papers/goodvir.html" rel="nofollow" title="Link to paper by Vesselin Bontchev">excellent paper</a> by Vesselin Bontchev if you want to read more about that. Or if you don't have the time or will-power to wade through Vesselin's paper, here's a <a href="http://www.sophos.com/pressoffice/news/articles/2005/08/va_goodvirusbadidea.html">succinct, perfectly formed and much more amusing piece</a> by my colleague Paul Ducklin)</p>
<p><font style="font-size: 8pt;" size="-1">Disclaimer: Please bear in mind that this poll is not scientific and is provided for information purposes only. Sophos makes no guarantees about the accuracy of the results other than that they reflect the choices of the users who participated.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/09/75-worm-author-iphone-users-favour-poll-reveals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft's COFEE forensic tool leaks onto the web</title>
		<link>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/09/microsofts-cofee-forensic-tool-leaks-web/</link>
		<comments>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/09/microsofts-cofee-forensic-tool-leaks-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Graham Cluley, Sophos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Data loss]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Law and Order]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[P2P]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cofee]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/?p=6590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to media reports, a tool developed by Microsoft to assist in computer crime investigations has leaked onto the web.
COFEE (Computer Online Forensic Evidence Extractor) is a system designed to collect digital evidence from suspect's computers while they are running, without the investigating officer having to do much more than inserting a USB stick.

COFEE allows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2009/11/09/238474/illegal-copies-of-microsoft-cofee-spills-onto-the-web.htm" rel="nofollow" title="Link to ComputerWeekly article">media reports</a>, a tool developed by Microsoft to assist in computer crime investigations has leaked onto the web.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/industry/government/solutions/cofee/default.aspx" rel="nofollow" title="Link to information about COFEE on Microsoft's website">COFEE (Computer Online Forensic Evidence Extractor)</a> is a system designed to collect digital evidence from suspect's computers while they are running, without the investigating officer having to do much more than inserting a USB stick.</p>
<p><img src="http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/microsoft-cofee.jpg" alt="Microsoft COFEE" title="Microsoft COFEE"></p>
<p>COFEE allows computer crime investigators to grab a dump of processes running on an active computer at the scene of an investigation.  The ability to grab a perfect copy of data from a PC without interfering with a computer is attractive to the computer crime authorities - and it's especially handy when more and more drives are using encryption and strong passwords to prevent unauthorised access.</p>
<p>But at the same time, you can probably understand why Microsoft might wish to control who can get their paws on the software.</p>
<p>Yes, it's understandable that some will be concerned that disreputable parties may now have access to a tool which may assist them in their own criminal activities.  But more than that, what's to say that the bad guys couldn't analyse COFEE, and write their own code which neutralises it (or wipes sensitive data from their computer) if they determine it is being run on their own computer?</p>
<p>That, after all, might make life difficult for the computer cops when they try and dash-and-grab data from a suspicious PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/09/microsofts-cofee-forensic-tool-leaks-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worm author tells media he initially infected 100 iPhones</title>
		<link>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/09/worm-author-tells-media-initially-infected-100-iphones/</link>
		<comments>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/09/worm-author-tells-media-initially-infected-100-iphones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Graham Cluley, Sophos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ikee]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ikex]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[worm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/?p=6581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The author of the world's first iPhone worm appears to be feeling pretty cocky about the whole incident.
Without a hint of apology, or the slightest acknowledgement that he may have done something wrong, Ashley Towns has been speaking to the media who have contacted him via his Twitter account.
Towns, who goes by the online handle [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/ashley-towns-170.gif" align="right" vspace="10" hspace="10" alt="Ashley Towns, author of the ikee iPhone worm" title="Ashley Towns, author of the ikee iPhone worm"><br />
The author of the <a href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/11/08/iphone-worm-discovered-wallpaper-rick-astley-photo/">world's first iPhone worm</a> appears to be feeling pretty cocky about the whole incident.</p>
<p>Without a hint of apology, or the slightest acknowledgement that he may have done something wrong, Ashley Towns has been speaking to the media who have contacted him via <a href="http://twitter.com/ikeeex" rel="nofollow" title="Link to Ashley Towns' Twitter account">his Twitter account</a>.</p>
<p>Towns, who goes by the online handle of "ikex", spread the ikee worm which broke into jailbroken iPhones and installed a picture of Rick Astley before hunting for other vulnerable devices. In an <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/11/09/2737673.htm" rel="nofollow" title="Link to ABC News report">interview with ABC News</a>, the 21-year-old student was asked if he knew how many iPhones had been affected:</p>
<blockquote><p><tt>"Due to the nature of it, it's kind of hard to tell, I know my phone hit about 100 alone but from there I have no idea," he said.</tt>
</p></blockquote>
<p>So, it appears that Ashley Towns is admitting that he personally infected 100 iPhones from his own iPhone.  Those iPhones would then have tried to infect other jailbroken iPhones, and so on, and so on..</p>
<p>Each of these affected users would need to take action to repair their iPhones from the unauthorised modifications.  Yes, they should have been better secured in the first place - but surely that's not an acceptable justification for virus infection?</p>
<p>And don't forget, Ashley Towns will have cost each infected iPhone user all the bandwidth used by his malware - remembering that even just trying to initiate TCP connections to computers which won't accept them wastes <em>some</em> data - and his worm has some huge IP address ranges through which it tries to open connections.</p>
<p>The bandwidth used by the worm will come out of users' monthly data quotes or - depending on their payment plan - out of excess data charges.  Lord forbid you should be unknowingly roaming overseas whilst infected!</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2228830.js"></script><noscript><br />
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2228830/">Do you think the iPhone will be exposed to more virus attacks in future?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com">polls</a>)</span><br />
</noscript></p>
<p>Towns has said on his Twitter page that he is receiving requests from people for the source code to his worm.  Sophos has contacted him requesting that he does not share it with any further people - as it could lead to more malicious iPhone malware being written in the future.</p>
<p>It remains to be seen whether the author of the first iPhone worm will recognise the seriousness of what he has done, and take appropriate steps to minimise the damage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/09/worm-author-tells-media-initially-infected-100-iphones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First iPhone worm discovered - ikee changes wallpaper to Rick Astley photo</title>
		<link>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/08/iphone-worm-discovered-wallpaper-rick-astley-photo/</link>
		<comments>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/08/iphone-worm-discovered-wallpaper-rick-astley-photo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Graham Cluley, Sophos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ikee]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ikex]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rick astley]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[worm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/?p=6549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Apple iPhone owners in Australia have reported that their smartphones have been infected by a worm that has changed their wallpaper to an image of 1980s pop crooner Rick Astley.
The worm, which could have spread to other countries although we have no confirmed reports outside Australia, is capable of breaking into jailbroken iPhones if their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/ikee-170.jpg" align="right" vspace="10" hspace="10" alt="Message from the ikee iPhone worm" title="Message from the ikee iPhone worm"><br />
Apple iPhone owners in Australia have <a href="http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1315624" rel="nofollow" title="Link to Whirlpool forum">reported</a> that their smartphones have been infected by a worm that has changed their wallpaper to an image of 1980s pop crooner Rick Astley.</p>
<p>The worm, which <em>could</em> have spread to other countries although we have no confirmed reports outside Australia, is capable of breaking into jailbroken iPhones if their owners have not changed the default password after installing SSH.  Once in place, the worm appears to attempt to find other iPhones on the mobile phone network that are similarly vulnerable, and installs itself again</p>
<p>On each installation, the worm - written by a hacker calling themselves "ikex" - changes the lock background wallpaper to an image of Rick Astley with the message:</p>
<blockquote><p><tt>ikee is never going to give you up</tt></p></blockquote>
<p>What's clear is that if you have jailbroken your iPhone or iPod Touch, and installed SSH, then you must always change your root user password to something different than the default, "alpine". In fact, it would be a good idea if you didn't use a dictionary word at all.</p>
<p>The worm will not affect users who have not jailbroken their iPhones or who have not installed SSH.</p>
<p><img src="http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/ikee-iphone-wallpaper.jpg" alt="Wallpaper of Rick Astley displayed by the ikee iPhone worm" title="Wallpaper of Rick Astley displayed by the ikee iPhone worm"></p>
<p>SophosLabs is analysing the worm's code, which suggests that at least four variants have been written so far.  One of the attributes of the latest variant (labelled the "D" version) is that it tries to hide its presence by using a filepath suggestive of the Cydia application.</p>
<p>The source code is littered with comments from the author suggesting the worm has been written as an experiment. One of the comments berates affected users for not following instructions when installing SSH, because if they had changed the default password the worm would not have been able to infect them.</p>
<p><img src="http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/ikee-code.jpg" alt="ikee worm code" title="ikee worm code"></p>
<p>Presently it appears that the worm does nothing more malicious than spread and change the infected user's lock screen wallpaper.  However, that doesn't mean that attacks like this can be considered harmless.</p>
<p>Accessing someone else's computing device and changing their data without permission is an offence in many countries - and just as with graffiti there is a cost involved in cleaning-up affected iPhones. </p>
<p>Other inquisitive hackers may also be tempted to experiment once they read about the world's first iPhone worm. Furthermore, a more malicious hacker could take the code written by ikee and adapt it to have a more sinister payload.</p>
<p>iPhone users may rush into jailbreaking their iPhones in order to add functionality that Apple may have denied to them, but if they do so carelessly they may also risk their iPhone becoming the target of a hacker.</p>
<p>My prediction is that we may see more attacks like this in the future.  Indeed, only last week we saw hacked iPhones in the Netherlands being <a href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/11/03/hacked-iphones-held-hostage-5-euros/">held hostage for 5 Euros</a>.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2228830.js"></script><noscript><br />
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2228830/">Do you think the iPhone will be exposed to more virus attacks in future?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com">polls</a>)</span><br />
</noscript></p>
<h2>Who wrote the ikee iPhone worm?</h2>
<p>The source code of the worm says at its start:</p>
<blockquote><p><tt>// "ikee virus" by ikex</tt><br />
<tt>//      Revision: 10 (Variant D)</tt></p></blockquote>
<p>A quick trawl of the Whirlpool forum where users are reporting that their iPhones are unexpectedly displaying an image of Rick Astley, reveals a user <a href="http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1315624&#038;ux=107027#r1" rel="nofollow" title="Link to posts on Whirlpool forum">calling themselves "ike_x"</a>.</p>
<p>According to ike_x's user profile on the Whirlpool forum his nearest city is Sydney, Australia . Further searching on the internet reveals other pages seemingly related to ike_x of Wollongong, New South Wales, using the name "Ash" or "Ashley Towns". For instance, here is a <a href="http://www.myspace.com/areallylongurlisannoying" rel="nofollow" title="Link to MySpace page">MySpace page</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/ikeeex" rel="nofollow" title="Link to Twitter page">this appears to be Ash/ikex on Twitter</a>.</p>
<p>The worm's author appears to have realised that people might be interested to learn why he wrote the worm, and posted this explanation inside the code:</p>
<blockquote><p>
<tt>Why?: Boredom, because i found it so stupid the fact that on my initial scan of my 3G optus range i found 27 hosts running SSH daemons, i could access 26 of them with root:alpine. Doesn't anyone RTFM anymore?</tt></p></blockquote>
<p>There is a certain irony in the notion that a hacker who says he was trying to expose sloppy security by the owners of jailbroken iPhones has done such a bad job of covering his own tracks..</p>
<p><em>Source of image of affected iPhone: <a href="http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1315624#r13" rel="nofollow" title="Link to post on Whirlpool forum by Batman">Batman from the Whirlpool forums</a></em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/08/iphone-worm-discovered-wallpaper-rick-astley-photo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Think you've won a MacBook Air? Beware email malware attack</title>
		<link>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/06/won-macbook-air-beware-email-malware-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/06/won-macbook-air-beware-email-malware-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Graham Cluley, Sophos</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Air]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Trojan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/?p=6537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Apple's super-skinny MacBook Air is one of the most desirable laptops on the planet - which means it's not too surprising if criminals try and take advantage of its allure to infect unsuspecting computer users.
And that's exactly what hackers are doing today in a malicious email campaign that has been spammed widely out across the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/macbook-air-170.jpg" align="right" vspace="10" hspace="10" alt="MacBook Air" title="MacBook Air"><br />
Apple's super-skinny MacBook Air is one of the most desirable laptops on the planet - which means it's not too surprising if criminals try and take advantage of its allure to infect unsuspecting computer users.</p>
<p>And that's exactly what hackers are doing today in a malicious email campaign that has been spammed widely out across the internet.</p>
<p>Unsuspecting computer users may find an email with the subject line "Congratulations" in their inbox this morning, telling them that they "have won todays Macbook Air" and that they should open the attached file (called winner.zip) for more information.</p>
<p>Here's the full text of the email:</p>
<blockquote><p><tt>Congratulations!! You have won todays Macbook Air.<br />
Please open attached file and see datails.</tt>
</p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/macbook-air-malware.jpg" alt="Malicious email claiming that you have won a MacBook Air" title="Malicious email claiming you have won a MacBook Air"></p>
<p>Of course, in reality you haven't one a competition, and there is no MacBook Air up for grabs.  Instead, the hackers who spammed out the messages are hoping that the thought of winning a sexy laptop will be enough to make you open the attached file and infect your computer.</p>
<p>Sophos is detecting the attached Trojan horse as <a href="http://www.sophos.com/security/analyses/viruses-and-spyware/malencpkle.html">Mal/EncPk-LE</a>.  </p>
<p>The MacBook Air was launched in January 2008, catching the imagination of the media with its thin frame and adverts claiming it was the "world's thinnest laptop" as it was shown it being slipped inside a Manila envelope.  The lesson to learn today is that receiving news of a complimentary MacBook Air in your <em>electronic</em> mail might not be the safest thing in the world.</p>
<p>At least Apple users can feel smug about one thing - this particular Trojan horse doesn't work on Mac OS X, only Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcluleyblog.brown.sophos/index.php/2009/11/06/won-macbook-air-beware-email-malware-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
